Every figure this model derived for WPM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
1,153,593,000
CashAndCashEquivalents
2025-12-31
current assets
1,204,169,000
CurrentAssets
2025-12-31
current liabilities
154,687,000
CurrentLiabilities
2025-12-31
equity
8,690,508,000
Equity
2025-12-31
interest expense
5,760,000
FinanceCosts
2025-12-31
ocf
1,904,981,000
CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
2,314,600,000
Revenue
2025-12-31
sbc
26,029,000
AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WPM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
69.51
current ratio
7.78
current ratio reported
7.78
dilution pct
0.12
ebit cagr
20.32
ebit yoy
154.76
fcf margin
82.3
growth cv
1.63
interest cover
274.59
operating margin
68.33
owner earnings margin
81.18
revenue growth
80.18
revenue growth per share
79.95
roic
16.56
rule of 40
148.51
sbc pct revenue
1.12
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WPM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage