Every figure this model derived for WINA, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-27.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
141,300
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-27
cash
25,834,500
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-27
current assets
30,767,700
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-27
current liabilities
8,204,700
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-27
equity
-37,622,700
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-27
interest expense
2,446,900
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-27
ocf
43,380,600
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-27
revenue
86,534,900
Revenues
2026-06-27
sbc
2,445,900
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-27
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WINA on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
65.6
current ratio
4.71
current ratio reported
3.75
deferred revenue growth
0.05
dilution pct
0.49
ebit cagr
0.17
ebit yoy
-0.76
fcf margin
49.97
growth cv
2.0
interest cover
22.04
operating margin
62.33
owner earnings margin
47.14
revenue growth
3.76
revenue growth per share
3.26
rpo growth
0.83
rule of 40
66.1
sbc pct revenue
2.83
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WINA's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is -63M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions