Every figure this model derived for WHD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WHD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
28.35
current ratio
2.89
current ratio reported
2.59
deferred revenue growth
418.49
ebit cagr
11.31
ebit yoy
-8.13
fcf margin
26.92
growth cv
0.94
interest cover
72.77
operating margin
18.65
owner earnings margin
24.97
revenue growth
21.79
revenue growth per share
21.79
roic
22.49
rule of 40
40.43
sbc pct revenue
1.95
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WHD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2021-03-31 (1978 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions