Every figure this model derived for WES, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2013-12-31
cash
647,495,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
1,539,407,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
1,407,157,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
interest expense
406,587,000
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
2,161,735,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
4,049,866,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
53,409,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WES on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
60.62
current ratio
1.26
current ratio reported
1.09
deferred revenue growth
1609.34
ebit cagr
1.39
ebit yoy
-2.37
fcf margin
53.38
growth cv
1.03
interest cover
4.08
net debt ebitda
3.34
operating margin
41.01
owner earnings margin
52.06
revenue growth
11.43
revenue growth per share
11.43
rpo growth
8.73
rule of 40
52.43
sbc pct revenue
1.32
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WES's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2013-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-01 (121 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
invested capital is 0M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServiceExcludingDepreciationDepletionAndAmortization - dep_amort
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions