Every figure this model derived for WELL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
4,703,775,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
equity
43,793,675,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
666,959,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-03-31
ocf
2,952,730,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
11,766,873,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
1,558,057,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WELL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
29.29
dilution pct
11.63
fcf margin
25.09
growth cv
0.57
interest cover
-0.5
net debt ebitda
7.01
operating margin
-2.83
owner earnings margin
11.85
revenue growth
37.55
revenue growth per share
23.22
roic
-0.46
rule of 40
34.72
sbc pct revenue
13.24
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WELL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-04-24 (128 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity