Every figure this model derived for WDSP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-07-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WDSP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
70.01
current ratio
11.44
current ratio reported
11.44
dilution pct
2.52
ebit cagr
18.46
ebit yoy
140.0
fcf margin
-35.77
growth cv
1.72
operating margin
70.01
owner earnings margin
-35.77
revenue growth
71.15
revenue growth per share
66.94
roic
56.39
rule of 40
141.16
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WDSP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2021-06-30, 1492 days before the revenue period (2025-07-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-07-31 (395 days old, balance sheet); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 0M of net cash against a 8M annual burn is 0.0 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
no interest expense tagged while 0M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect