Every figure this model derived for VWAVW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
26,186
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
6,324,433
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
39,586,740
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
129,657,491
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
119,176
InterestPaid
2026-06-30
ocf
-17,545,334
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
7,943,534
SellingAndMarketingExpense
2026-06-30
sbc
2,636,283
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-09-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VWAVW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-317.3
current ratio
0.16
current ratio reported
0.16
fcf margin
-220.88
interest cover
-352.56
operating margin
-528.94
owner earnings margin
-254.06
roic
-25.61
sbc pct revenue
33.19
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VWAVW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left