Voya Financial, Inc. (VOYA)

Every figure this model derived for VOYA, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	0	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2017-09-30
cash	1,142,000,000	`CashCashEquivalentsRestrictedCashAndRestrictedCashEquivalents`	2026-06-30
equity	4,685,000,000	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	115,000,000	`InterestPaidNet`	2025-12-31
ocf	1,192,000,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	8,166,000,000	`Revenues`	2026-06-30
sbc	87,000,000	`AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up VOYA on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	13.78
dilution pct	-3.95
ebit yoy	19.31
fcf margin	14.6
growth cv	4.6
interest cover	9.03
net debt ebitda	1.49
operating margin	12.71
owner earnings margin	13.53
revenue growth	3.16
revenue growth per share	7.4
roic	13.16
rule of 40	15.87
sbc pct revenue	1.07

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about VOYA's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2017-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin trend
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left