Every figure this model derived for VNDA, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
674,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
438,514,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
264,484,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
164,026,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
220,185,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-142,331,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
215,721,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
9,067,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VNDA on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-81.34
current ratio
1.61
current ratio reported
1.61
deferred revenue growth
-99.35
dilution pct
1.34
fcf margin
-66.29
operating margin
-86.07
owner earnings margin
-70.49
revenue growth
6.02
revenue growth per share
4.62
rule of 40
-80.05
sbc pct revenue
4.2
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VNDA's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged since 2020-12-31; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServiceExcludingDepreciationDepletionAndAmortization - dep_amort
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 431M of net cash against a 143M annual burn is 3.0 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
no interest expense tagged while 7M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect