Every figure this model derived for VIR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,087,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
528,593,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
573,739,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
94,961,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
982,493,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-202,506,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
303,227,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
47,040,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VIR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-73.09
current ratio
6.04
current ratio reported
6.04
deferred revenue growth
-100.0
dilution pct
1.67
fcf margin
-67.14
growth cv
2.14
operating margin
-92.4
owner earnings margin
-82.66
revenue growth
1495.93
revenue growth per share
1469.72
roic
-48.77
rule of 40
1403.53
sbc pct revenue
15.51
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VIR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfRevenue
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 529M of net cash against a 204M annual burn is 2.6 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage