Every figure this model derived for VIK, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
3,803,944,000
CashAndCashEquivalents
2025-12-31
current assets
4,502,993,000
CurrentAssets
2025-12-31
current liabilities
5,717,265,000
CurrentLiabilities
2025-12-31
equity
1,093,778,000
EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent
2025-12-31
interest expense
362,575,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
2,560,310,000
CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
6,501,419,000
RevenueFromContractsWithCustomers
2025-12-31
sbc
88,518,000
AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VIK on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
28.84
current ratio
0.79
current ratio reported
0.79
dilution pct
21.75
ebit cagr
188.1
ebit yoy
39.67
fcf margin
39.38
growth cv
0.54
interest cover
4.14
net debt ebitda
1.18
operating margin
23.1
owner earnings margin
38.02
revenue growth
21.89
revenue growth per share
0.11
roic
37.14
rule of 40
44.98
sbc pct revenue
1.36
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VIK's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractsWithCustomers - CostOfSales
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth