Every figure this model derived for VHAI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
180,562
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2025-09-30
cash
4,057
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-09-30
current assets
28,607
AssetsCurrent
2025-09-30
current liabilities
7,124,451
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-09-30
equity
-7,072,668
StockholdersEquity
2025-09-30
interest expense
862,159
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-09-30
ocf
-783,954
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-09-30
revenue
50,078
Revenues
2024-12-31
sbc
153,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VHAI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-2469.79
current ratio
0.0
current ratio reported
0.0
deferred revenue growth
0.0
dilution pct
13904.65
fcf margin
-1926.03
interest cover
-1.62
revenue growth
-80.47
revenue growth per share
-99.86
rule of 40
-2868.45
sbc pct revenue
305.52
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VHAI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, owner earnings margin, net margin, ebitda margin -- net margin came out at -12,377% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 50,078 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
revenue is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2024-12-31 (608 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-19 (255 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: worst year
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left