Every figure this model derived for VALE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VALE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.95
current ratio
1.15
current ratio reported
1.15
dilution pct
-0.14
ebit cagr
-32.07
ebit yoy
-45.34
growth cv
17.57
interest cover
4.5
operating margin
15.36
revenue growth
0.91
revenue growth per share
1.06
roic
17.68
rule of 40
16.27
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VALE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating cash flow last tagged 2021-12-31, 1461 days before the revenue period (2025-12-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2021-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: owner earnings
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage