Every figure this model derived for VAL-WT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
VAL-WT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
1946.26
current ratio
1.82
current ratio reported
1.55
deferred revenue growth
59.43
dilution pct
-2.75
ebit cagr
70.65
ebit yoy
-53.76
fcf margin
-112.62
interest cover
2.66
net debt ebitda
0.84
operating margin
1126.17
owner earnings margin
-249.07
roic
5.37
rpo growth
35.05
sbc pct revenue
136.45
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about VAL-WT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: gross margin, net margin, capex intensity -- gross margin came out at -7,414% against a scale that tops out near 4,250%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 21,400,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: revenue growth