Every figure this model derived for TWG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2022-12-31
cash
2,387,158
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
17,440,470
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
1,635,766
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
27,761,375
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
ocf
-6,194,419
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
9,129,706
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
1,658,844
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TWG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
10.66
current ratio reported
10.66
dilution pct
116.66
fcf margin
-67.85
growth cv
1.73
owner earnings margin
-86.02
revenue growth
92.3
revenue growth per share
-11.24
sbc pct revenue
18.17
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TWG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; summing the costs it tags misses its own pre-tax profit by 26.4% of revenue, far more than interest can explain, so a cost line it does not tag is missing and the sum was refused rather than used
presents no operating result, and rebuilding it from the statement missed the reported pre-tax profit by 74.59% of revenue, so it is refused rather than used (no value anywhere for OtherNonoperatingIncome, ProvisionForInventoryImpairment)
revenue is annual, not TTM
no operating income found in XBRL
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2022-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 2M of net cash against a 6M annual burn is 0.4 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, growth -- 75% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left