Tradewinds Universal (TRWD)

Every figure this model derived for TRWD, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up TRWD on one particular measure came for.

Everything else this filing tags

117 more elements from TRWD's own XBRL that this model has no measure for, newest reading each, largest first. Nothing here is converted, added up or renamed — it is the filing's own element names and the filing's own numbers.

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about TRWD's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

• WITHHELD: operating margin -- operating margin came out at -2,624% against a scale that tops out near 2,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 147,050 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
• no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
• there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (5.9x) instead
• no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 0M of net cash against a 0M annual burn is 0.0 years
• analyst estimate not used: trailing EPS is not positive, so a growth rate would be meaningless
• quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: operating margin
• durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth