Every figure this model derived for TPHS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2011-08-27
cash
277,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2024-12-31
current assets
178,184,000
AssetsCurrent
2012-02-25
current liabilities
157,001,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2012-02-25
equity
2,201,000
StockholdersEquity
2024-12-31
interest expense
915,000
InterestPaidNet
2024-12-31
ocf
-7,942,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2024-12-31
revenue
3,542,000
Revenues
2024-12-31
sbc
740,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TPHS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-88.4
current ratio
1.13
current ratio reported
1.13
dilution pct
63.14
fcf margin
-224.22
growth cv
2.23
interest cover
-5.44
operating margin
-140.49
owner earnings margin
-245.12
revenue growth
-89.46
revenue growth per share
-93.54
roic
-204.32
rule of 40
-229.94
sbc pct revenue
20.89
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TPHS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2024-12-31 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue period ends 2024-12-31 (607 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2011-08-27); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-03-24 (524 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit last tagged 2011-02-26 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left