Every figure this model derived for TOPS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
9,310,000
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
20,372,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
24,045,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
39,554,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
89,189,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
23,406,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
26,431,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
80,415,000
OperatingLeaseLeaseIncome
2025-12-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TOPS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
49.26
current ratio
0.61
current ratio reported
0.61
deferred revenue growth
7.33
dilution pct
0.0
ebit cagr
15.43
ebit yoy
-5.82
fcf margin
21.29
growth cv
2.51
interest cover
1.12
net debt ebitda
5.25
operating margin
32.68
owner earnings margin
21.29
revenue growth
-6.63
revenue growth per share
-6.63
roic
6.98
rule of 40
26.05
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TOPS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, balance sheet); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left