Every figure this model derived for TNET, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
82,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
358,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
2,384,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,109,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
125,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
50,000,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
370,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
4,884,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
67,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TNET on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
1.17
current ratio reported
1.13
deferred revenue growth
85.37
dilution pct
-2.0
fcf margin
5.9
growth cv
1.1
owner earnings margin
4.52
revenue growth
-3.46
revenue growth per share
-1.49
rpo growth
-100.0
sbc pct revenue
1.37
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TNET's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2024-09-30, 638 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
presents no operating result. It was rebuilt for the annual to 20251231, too far from this row's period (2026-06-30) to pair with it
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, growth -- 75% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left