Every figure this model derived for TNBI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2012-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TNBI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
27.61
current ratio
1.61
current ratio reported
1.61
dilution pct
21.63
ebit cagr
1.78
ebit yoy
160.62
fcf margin
-12.86
interest cover
9.24
operating margin
15.87
owner earnings margin
-21.59
revenue growth
19.84
revenue growth per share
-1.47
roic
26.49
rule of 40
35.71
sbc pct revenue
8.72
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TNBI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2013-09-30 (12y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2012-12-31 (4990 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2012-09-30 (5082 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left