Every figure this model derived for TMGI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-02-28.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-05-31
cash
349,224
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-02-28
current assets
792,384
AssetsCurrent
2026-02-28
current liabilities
8,769,730
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-02-28
equity
-5,442,109
StockholdersEquity
2026-02-28
interest expense
2,126,540
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-02-28
ocf
-1,267,846
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-02-28
revenue
486,471
Revenues
2026-02-28
sbc
0
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2022-05-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TMGI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-159.68
current ratio
0.09
current ratio reported
0.09
dilution pct
154.79
fcf margin
-260.62
interest cover
-0.37
operating margin
-159.7
owner earnings margin
-260.62
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TMGI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2022-05-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-04-01 (151 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left