TULLOW OIL PLC (TLW.L)

Every figure this model derived for TLW.L, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	188,000,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2025-12-31
cash	332,200,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2026-01-01
current assets	1,079,300,000	`CurrentAssets`	2026-01-01
current liabilities	2,062,900,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2026-01-01
equity	-252,900,000	`EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent`	2026-01-01
interest expense	326,000,000	`FinanceCosts`	2025-12-31
ocf	334,300,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	847,000,000	`Revenue`	2025-12-31
sbc	7,700,000	`AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up TLW.L on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	24.51
current ratio	0.52
current ratio reported	0.52
ebit cagr	-21.51
ebit yoy	-55.45
fcf margin	17.27
interest cover	0.61
operating margin	23.6
owner earnings margin	16.36
revenue growth	-34.2
revenue growth per share	-34.2
rule of 40	-10.6
sbc pct revenue	0.91

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about TLW.L's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
reports in USD and quotes in GBP, so the share price is converted at 1 GBP = 1.3499 USD as at 2026-09-02. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate — but no share count is available, so there is still no market capitalisation
invested capital is -585M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage