Every figure this model derived for TBNRL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
317,429
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
88,151,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
118,106,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
59,096,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
395,554,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
381,044
InterestExpenseOperating
2025-06-30
ocf
-33,469,369
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
0
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
3,960,626
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TBNRL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
2.0
current ratio reported
2.0
dilution pct
55.19
interest cover
-86.34
roic
-6.93
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TBNRL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-01 (121 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
4 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, growth -- 85% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left