Every figure this model derived for TAYD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-05-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
2,136,301
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-05-31
cash
41,478,975
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-05-31
current assets
62,422,252
AssetsCurrent
2026-05-31
current liabilities
4,892,733
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-05-31
equity
72,852,151
StockholdersEquity
2026-05-31
interest expense
0
InterestPaid
2025-05-31
ocf
7,023,069
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-05-31
revenue
41,649,673
Revenues
2026-05-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2022-05-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TAYD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.2
current ratio
12.76
current ratio reported
12.76
ebit cagr
31.27
ebit yoy
-23.73
fcf margin
11.73
growth cv
1.2
operating margin
17.63
owner earnings margin
11.73
revenue growth
-10.03
revenue growth per share
-10.03
roic
18.49
rule of 40
7.6
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TAYD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2022-05-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage