Every figure this model derived for SUNC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
891,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
6,782,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
5,262,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
interest expense
541,000,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
1,192,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
25,201,000,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
19,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SUNC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
6.52
current ratio
1.31
current ratio reported
1.29
deferred revenue growth
500.0
ebit cagr
21.33
ebit yoy
18.2
fcf margin
4.73
interest cover
1.73
net debt ebitda
8.06
operating margin
3.71
owner earnings margin
4.65
revenue growth
11.05
revenue growth per share
11.05
rule of 40
14.76
sbc pct revenue
0.08
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SUNC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is 0M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostsAndExpenses
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: worst year
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth