Every figure this model derived for STRS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
73,539,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
equity
211,715,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
11,400,000
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
-31,996,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
28,662,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
2,355,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
STRS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
70.37
dilution pct
-0.51
fcf margin
-111.63
growth cv
4.51
interest cover
0.95
net debt ebitda
3.94
operating margin
37.65
owner earnings margin
-119.85
revenue growth
-12.4
revenue growth per share
-11.95
roic
3.02
rule of 40
25.25
sbc pct revenue
8.22
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about STRS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-04-30 (122 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity