Every figure this model derived for SSII, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
2,840,443
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
13,647,430
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
71,453,952
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
31,891,727
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
53,401,223
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
177,116
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-06-30
ocf
-15,533,733
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
48,465,503
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
9,441,067
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SSII on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
4.62
current ratio
2.55
current ratio reported
2.24
deferred revenue growth
62.32
dilution pct
9.66
fcf margin
-37.91
growth cv
0.39
interest cover
-47.88
operating margin
-17.5
owner earnings margin
-57.39
revenue growth
118.98
revenue growth per share
99.69
roic
-16.85
rule of 40
101.48
sbc pct revenue
19.48
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SSII's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth