Every figure this model derived for SSHT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-09-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
8,205
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2024-09-30
current assets
49,929
AssetsCurrent
2024-09-30
current liabilities
121,974
LiabilitiesCurrent
2024-09-30
equity
-72,045
StockholdersEquity
2024-09-30
interest expense
11
InterestExpense
2024-09-30
ocf
-106
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2024-09-30
revenue
155,957
Revenues
2024-09-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SSHT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
37.06
current ratio
0.41
current ratio reported
0.41
fcf margin
-0.07
interest cover
5255.0
operating margin
37.06
owner earnings margin
-0.07
revenue growth
48.41
revenue growth per share
48.41
rule of 40
85.48
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SSHT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2024-09-30 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
every figure here comes from one filing (10-Q), so there is no annual report and no history behind it. A company that has just reorganised files under a new registration number, and what it reported before that is not part of this record.
only 273 days of filings, not a full year: margins and growth are measured, but return on capital and every enterprise-value multiple are refused rather than annualised
revenue period ends 2024-09-30 (699 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2024-09-30 (699 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left