SMITHS NEWS PLC (SNWS.L)
Every figure this model derived for SNWS.L, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-08-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
| Figure | Value | XBRL tag | As at |
|---|---|---|---|
| capex | 3,900,000 | PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities |
2025-08-30 |
| cash | 8,200,000 | CashAndCashEquivalents |
2025-08-31 |
| current assets | 125,100,000 | CurrentAssets |
2025-08-31 |
| current liabilities | 133,300,000 | CurrentLiabilities |
2025-08-31 |
| equity | 9,500,000 | Equity |
2025-08-31 |
| interest expense | 3,600,000 | FinanceCosts |
2025-08-30 |
| ocf | 49,400,000 | CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities |
2025-08-30 |
| revenue | 1,064,000,000 | Revenue |
2025-08-30 |
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up SNWS.L on one particular measure came for.
| Ratio | Value |
|---|---|
| cash operating margin | 3.87 |
| current ratio | 0.94 |
| current ratio reported | 0.94 |
| ebit cagr | 3.57 |
| ebit yoy | 3.0 |
| ev ebit | 4.09 |
| ev owner earnings | 3.7 |
| ev sales | 0.16 |
| fcf margin | 4.28 |
| interest cover | 11.44 |
| operating margin | 3.87 |
| owner earnings margin | 4.28 |
| revenue growth | -3.6 |
| revenue growth per share | -3.6 |
| roic | 1084.93 |
| rule of 40 | 0.28 |
| sbc pct revenue | 0.0 |
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SNWS.L's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
- revenue is annual, not TTM
- operating income is annual, not TTM
- no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
- share count is from 2025-08-31 (383 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
- no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
- forward EPS growth -4.3% is analyst consensus, not a filing: consensus 2027 EPS 0.10 against trailing 0.11, over 2 year(s), from 3 analysts (taken 2026-09-18)
- PEG not measured: earnings are expected to grow -4.3%, and the ratio inverts at or below zero — a company whose profit is expected to fall faster would otherwise score better for it
- durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage