Every figure this model derived for SMXT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-12-31
cash
10,554,868
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
80,456,273
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
98,018,140
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
-11,407,976
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
1,294,867
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
498,049
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
98,885,683
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
520,721
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SMXT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-4.52
current ratio
0.82
current ratio reported
0.82
dilution pct
12.71
fcf margin
0.5
growth cv
1.75
interest cover
-3.9
operating margin
-5.1
owner earnings margin
-0.02
revenue growth
309.46
revenue growth per share
263.27
rule of 40
304.36
sbc pct revenue
0.53
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SMXT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-11 (111 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth