Every figure this model derived for SMJF, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
49,590
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
9,097,387
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
15,403,063
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
3,318,952
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
14,668,982
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
118,547
InterestPaidNet
2026-03-31
ocf
-2,642,063
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
13,526,925
Revenues
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SMJF on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-5.03
current ratio
5.47
current ratio reported
4.64
deferred revenue growth
124.25
dilution pct
3.47
fcf margin
-19.9
interest cover
-6.31
operating margin
-5.53
owner earnings margin
-19.9
roic
-10.61
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SMJF's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-03-31 (152 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left