Every figure this model derived for SILO, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
5,227,242
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
5,713,526
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,065,733
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
4,886,290
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
39,826
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
-3,340,255
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
54,077
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
195,369
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SILO on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
5.53
current ratio reported
5.36
deferred revenue growth
-53.9
dilution pct
127.88
growth cv
1.97
interest cover
-112.03
revenue growth
-25.0
revenue growth per share
-67.09
rule of 40
-8275.46
sbc pct revenue
361.28
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SILO's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, ocf margin -- net margin came out at -8,270% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 54,077 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left