Every figure this model derived for SHW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SHW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
18.4
current ratio
0.76
current ratio reported
0.73
deferred revenue growth
21.02
dilution pct
-1.46
ev ebit
23.98
ev owner earnings
30.97
ev sales
3.92
fcf margin
13.16
growth cv
0.78
interest cover
7.74
net debt ebitda
2.74
operating margin
16.36
owner earnings margin
12.67
revenue growth
5.76
revenue growth per share
7.33
roic
19.93
rule of 40
22.13
sbc pct revenue
0.49
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SHW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2024-09-30, 638 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 2.1% of revenue from the 3,492M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions