Every figure this model derived for SCTH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
280,340
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2026-06-30
cash
311,711
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
9,458,668
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
8,625,056
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
10,774,195
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
114,074
InterestPaid
2026-06-30
revenue
12,573,473
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2018-09-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SCTH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-1.2
current ratio
1.1
current ratio reported
1.1
dilution pct
185.51
growth cv
2.0
interest cover
-1.98
operating margin
-1.79
revenue growth
80576.76
revenue growth per share
28157.12
roic
-1.67
rule of 40
80574.97
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SCTH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2018-09-30); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: owner earnings
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left