Every figure this model derived for SCIA, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SCIA on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
12.06
current ratio
13.95
current ratio reported
2.77
deferred revenue growth
429.77
dilution pct
0.29
ebit cagr
6.19
ebit yoy
104.04
fcf margin
5.38
growth cv
1.97
operating margin
10.15
owner earnings margin
5.09
revenue growth
87.87
revenue growth per share
87.33
roic
48.92
rule of 40
98.02
sbc pct revenue
0.29
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SCIA's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions