RESERVE PETROLEUM CO (RSRV)

Every figure this model derived for RSRV, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	0	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2012-12-31
cash	8,262,472	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2026-06-30
current assets	10,878,180	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	1,078,363	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	35,804,025	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	41,384	`InterestPaidNet`	2026-06-30
ocf	11,854,077	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	20,264,177	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerIncludingAssessedTax`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up RSRV on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	21.15
current ratio	10.09
current ratio reported	10.09
dilution pct	-1.44
ebit cagr	-10.95
ebit yoy	90.4
fcf margin	58.5
growth cv	1.24
interest cover	103.58
operating margin	21.15
owner earnings margin	58.5
revenue growth	29.74
revenue growth per share	31.63
roic	11.89
rule of 40	50.89
sbc pct revenue	0.0

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about RSRV's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2012-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left