Every figure this model derived for ROC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
864,485
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
11,700,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
18,198,952
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
3,384,674
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
17,807,550
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
80,982
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
-997,670
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
16,979,679
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
472,257
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ROC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-8.02
current ratio
6.33
current ratio reported
5.38
deferred revenue growth
-20.24
dilution pct
0.14
fcf margin
-10.97
interest cover
-24.69
operating margin
-11.77
owner earnings margin
-13.75
revenue growth
23.9
revenue growth per share
23.72
roic
-25.86
rule of 40
12.12
sbc pct revenue
2.78
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ROC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left