Every figure this model derived for RGS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,909,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
22,930,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
54,343,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
91,664,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
189,450,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
21,023,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-03-31
ocf
15,676,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
228,880,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
649,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
RGS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
12.89
current ratio
0.62
current ratio reported
0.59
deferred revenue growth
-15.2
dilution pct
12.85
ebit yoy
45.68
fcf margin
6.01
interest cover
1.19
net debt ebitda
3.29
operating margin
10.98
owner earnings margin
5.73
revenue growth
14.95
revenue growth per share
1.86
roic
6.98
rpo growth
-28.2
rule of 40
25.93
sbc pct revenue
0.28
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about RGS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-06 (116 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit last tagged 2012-06-30 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability