Every figure this model derived for RDCT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-09-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2017-12-31
cash
3,416
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2024-09-30
current assets
3,416
AssetsCurrent
2024-09-30
current liabilities
7,680,710
LiabilitiesCurrent
2024-09-30
equity
-7,677,295
StockholdersEquity
2024-09-30
ocf
-413,125
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2024-09-30
revenue
352,684
Revenues
2024-09-30
sbc
381,500
ShareBasedCompensation
2023-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
RDCT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-504.06
current ratio
0.0
current ratio reported
0.0
fcf margin
-117.14
growth cv
0.99
operating margin
-612.23
owner earnings margin
-225.31
revenue growth
-36.32
revenue growth per share
-36.32
rule of 40
-648.55
sbc pct revenue
108.17
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about RDCT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2024-09-30 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue period ends 2024-09-30 (699 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2017-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2024-09-30 (699 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin trend
no interest expense tagged while 2M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect