RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (QSP)

Every figure this model derived for QSP, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	272,000,000	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2026-06-30
cash	1,063,000,000	`CashCashEquivalentsRestrictedCashAndRestrictedCashEquivalents`	2026-06-30
current assets	2,343,000,000	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	2,314,000,000	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	5,395,000,000	`StockholdersEquityIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterest`	2026-06-30
interest expense	683,000,000	`InterestPaidNet`	2026-06-30
ocf	1,904,000,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	9,699,000,000	`Revenues`	2026-06-30
sbc	140,000,000	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up QSP on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	31.48
current ratio	1.01
current ratio reported	1.01
deferred revenue growth	-41.9
ebit cagr	9.49
ebit yoy	22.35
fcf margin	16.83
growth cv	0.28
interest cover	3.82
net debt ebitda	4.3
operating margin	26.87
owner earnings margin	15.38
revenue growth	6.51
revenue growth per share	6.51
roic	11.49
rpo growth	-3.5
rule of 40	33.38
sbc pct revenue	1.44

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about QSP's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2014-12-31 (4260 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit last tagged 2014-12-31 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability