Every figure this model derived for QDMI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-03-31
cash
10,162,351
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
20,850,446
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,527,329
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
18,713,552
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
5,874
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
1,771,285
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
26,273,132
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2023-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
QDMI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
39.44
current ratio
13.65
current ratio reported
13.65
deferred revenue growth
11.55
dilution pct
0.36
ebit cagr
443.26
ebit yoy
37.03
fcf margin
6.74
growth cv
1.36
interest cover
1760.23
operating margin
39.35
owner earnings margin
6.74
revenue growth
138.59
revenue growth per share
137.74
roic
95.52
rule of 40
177.94
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about QDMI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2023-03-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-03-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage