Every figure this model derived for POCI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
349,750
PaymentsToAcquireOtherProductiveAssets
2026-03-31
cash
10,680,046
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
21,406,686
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
10,192,919
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
20,105,907
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
159,930
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
-1,470,345
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
28,938,632
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
1,182,373
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
POCI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-11.43
current ratio
2.69
current ratio reported
2.1
deferred revenue growth
33.57
dilution pct
11.91
fcf margin
-6.29
growth cv
1.34
interest cover
-29.75
operating margin
-16.44
owner earnings margin
-10.38
revenue growth
64.18
revenue growth per share
46.71
roic
-32.7
rule of 40
47.74
sbc pct revenue
4.09
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about POCI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-12 (110 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions