Every figure this model derived for PNRG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
75,954,000
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2025-12-31
cash
28,728,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
49,314,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
33,200,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
218,429,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
1,803,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
98,331,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
178,890,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PNRG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
53.33
current ratio
1.49
current ratio reported
1.49
dilution pct
-4.01
ebit cagr
-19.05
ebit yoy
-40.93
fcf margin
12.51
growth cv
1.46
interest cover
15.63
operating margin
15.75
owner earnings margin
12.51
revenue growth
-19.43
revenue growth per share
-16.06
roic
11.74
rule of 40
-3.67
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PNRG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2023-09-30, 1004 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage