Every figure this model derived for PMTW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
255,457,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2018-12-31
equity
1,853,374,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
1,053,651,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
-10,072,063,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
347,658,000
RevenuesNetOfInterestExpense
2026-06-30
sbc
4,707,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PMTW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
37.83
dilution pct
0.2
ebit cagr
22.11
ebit yoy
37.31
interest cover
0.12
operating margin
36.48
revenue growth
14.57
revenue growth per share
14.34
roic
6.27
rule of 40
51.05
sbc pct revenue
1.35
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PMTW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: owner earnings margin, fcf margin, ocf margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -2,898% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 347,658,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: owner earnings
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left