Every figure this model derived for PLUR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,328,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
42,887,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
10,463,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
32,006,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
-18,603,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
930,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-03-31
ocf
-20,361,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
1,079,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
4,088,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PLUR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-1985.82
current ratio
0.33
current ratio reported
0.33
deferred revenue growth
180.0
dilution pct
20.94
fcf margin
-2010.1
growth cv
1.5
interest cover
-27.97
operating margin
-2410.84
revenue growth
4.35
revenue growth per share
-13.72
rule of 40
-2406.49
sbc pct revenue
378.87
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PLUR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: owner earnings margin, net margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -2,389% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 1,079,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-13 (109 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 3 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic, owner earnings
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage