Every figure this model derived for PFE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-28.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
2,416,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-28
cash
8,257,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-28
current assets
41,358,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-28
current liabilities
32,646,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-28
equity
85,190,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-28
interest expense
2,698,000,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-28
ocf
13,401,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-28
revenue
63,696,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-28
sbc
947,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-28
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PFE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
1.3
current ratio reported
1.27
deferred revenue growth
-48.11
dilution pct
0.23
ev owner earnings
21.37
ev sales
3.37
fcf margin
17.25
growth cv
2.47
owner earnings margin
15.76
revenue growth
-0.21
revenue growth per share
-0.44
rpo growth
-59.09
sbc pct revenue
1.49
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PFE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; it could be summed from the costs it tags, but the company reports no pre-tax profit for the same period to check that sum against, so it was left out rather than guessed
presents no operating result, and rebuilding it from the statement missed the reported pre-tax profit by 21.49% of revenue, so it is refused rather than used
no operating income found in XBRL
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation rests on 1 of 2 inputs; not tagged: ev ebit
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, growth -- 50% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left