GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. (PEW)

Every figure this model derived for PEW, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up PEW on one particular measure came for.

Everything else this filing tags

185 more elements from PEW's own XBRL that this model has no measure for, newest reading each, largest first. Nothing here is converted, added up or renamed — it is the filing's own element names and the filing's own numbers.

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about PEW's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

• there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (-0.4x) instead
• no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 90M of net cash against a 20M annual burn is 4.4 years
• analyst estimate not used: trailing EPS is not positive, so a growth rate would be meaningless
• durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• 2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (durability, growth -- 30% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left
• no interest expense tagged while 8M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect