Every figure this model derived for PED, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
10,805,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
39,820,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
50,742,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
200,051,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
5,375,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
31,123,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
116,378,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
2,718,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PED on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
31.82
current ratio
0.78
current ratio reported
0.78
dilution pct
3.44
ebit cagr
68.5
fcf margin
26.74
growth cv
0.84
interest cover
3.03
operating margin
14.01
owner earnings margin
24.41
revenue growth
229.37
revenue growth per share
218.42
roic
6.8
rule of 40
243.37
sbc pct revenue
2.34
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PED's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin recent
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left