Every figure this model derived for OESX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
34,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
5,165,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
39,239,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
25,560,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
18,746,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
758,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-03-31
ocf
788,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
92,474,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
476,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
OESX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
3.91
current ratio
1.54
current ratio reported
1.54
deferred revenue growth
-78.23
dilution pct
8.47
fcf margin
0.82
interest cover
1.96
net debt ebitda
0.52
operating margin
1.6
owner earnings margin
0.3
revenue growth
16.48
revenue growth per share
7.39
roic
5.75
rule of 40
18.08
sbc pct revenue
0.51
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about OESX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-02-04 (207 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions