Every figure this model derived for OCG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
59,025
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-12-31
cash
35,339,009
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
56,945,798
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
1,889,218
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
64,638,682
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
ocf
77,103
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
1,888,848
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
3,790,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
OCG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
7.78
current ratio
30.2
current ratio reported
30.14
deferred revenue growth
-95.1
dilution pct
79.56
fcf margin
0.96
growth cv
5.04
operating margin
-203.48
owner earnings margin
-199.69
revenue growth
203.34
revenue growth per share
68.93
roic
-10.36
rule of 40
-0.14
sbc pct revenue
200.65
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about OCG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover